中華心理學刊 民100，53卷，1期，59-77
Chinese Journal of Psychology 2011, Vol.53, No.1, 59-77
吳志文（國立台灣大學心理學研究所）；葉光輝（國立台灣大學心理學研究所；中央研究院民族學研究所）
摘要
本研究主要目的在於以訊息區辨表現作為非自陳式的效標變項，透過不同情境操弄的兩個研究，再次驗證雙
元自主性模型提出的共存性觀點，並且進一步探討雙元自主性各自有其優勢作用範疇的運作機制。首先，兩個研究
的結果顯示：個體的個體化自主性功能主要發揮在與個人範疇相關的訊息區辨表現上；而其關係自主性功能主要作
用在與人際範疇相關的訊息區辨表現上。其次，個體唯有已經發展出高度的雙元自主性，才能夠在強調獨立或和諧
價值情境的促發下，有效地交互提取身上的個體化自主性與關係自主性，以因應情境需求而發揮相應優勢的訊息區
辨表現，支持了模型主張雙元自主性可以共存在單一個體身上的理論觀點（研究二之一和研究二之二）；換言之，
即便個體在情境下經驗到明確的目標需求，但如果個體缺乏對應目標需求的高自主性能力時，仍無法展現良好的訊
息區辨表現（研究二之二）。也就是說，個體的訊息區辨表現是透過情境需求與個體自主性強度兩者共同作用的
結果。
關鍵詞：共存、訊息區辨表現、範疇優勢性、雙元自主
The Coexistence and Domain Superiority Processing of Dual Autonomy: Decreasing Common Method Variance with Message Discernment
Chih-Wen Wu（Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University）；Kuang-Hui Yeh（Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University；Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica）
Abstract
By using objective dependent variables (performances on messages discernment) as criteria, the aims of this article are to reexamine the coexistence and domain-superiority claims of dual autonomy model (DAM) in two successive studies. The results showed that (1) all two studies reconfirmed the domain-superiority claim of DAM by manifesting that individuating autonomy was greater associated with the performance on message discernment in intrapersonal domain situation, however relating autonomy was greater associated with the performance on message discernment in interpersonal domain situation; (2) the effects of situation manipulations could be found only within the adolescents who have higher corresponding autonomous capacity; this means that individuating autonomy and relating autonomy could be coexisting within an individual and an individual is capable of switching these two autonomy in different situations appeal (in study 2A and study 2B); (3) even under the situations in activating the pursuing of individuating/relating related goal, if the adolescences who do not hold the corresponding autonomous capacity, when compare to the adolescents of control group, they still cannot perform higher messages discernment significantly in the task (in study 2B). That is, the extent of performance on messages discernment was the outcome of the interacting effect between situational activation and individual’s autonomous capacity.
Keywords: coexistence, domain-superiority, dual autonomy model, message
